Radeon Sky 900 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGMA 600Tahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 May 2010 (15 years ago)27 March 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43584 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data32 ×2
TMUsno data112 ×2
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data480 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2010 27 March 2013
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm

Sky 900 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 61% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 and Radeon Sky 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Sky 900 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Sky 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 or Radeon Sky 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.