RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data54.81
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGMA 600AD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 May 2010 (15 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43072
Core clock speed400 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2115 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data203.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.99 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data96
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2010 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 224 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.