UHD Graphics Xe G1 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011) | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) |
| GPU code name | GMA 500 | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 November 2008 (17 years ago) | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 10 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | DDR4 |
| Shared memory | + | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10.1 | DirectX 12_1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 November 2008 | 15 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe G1 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 and UHD Graphics Xe G1. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
