Radeon PRO V710 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated344
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.65
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGMA 500Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 November 2008 (17 years ago)3 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores43456
Core clock speed200 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data158 Watt
Texture fill rateno data432.0
Floating-point processing powerno data27.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54
L0 Cacheno data864 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data54 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data28 GB
Memory bus widthno data224 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2008 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

PRO V710 has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 27 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.