CMP 170HX 8 GB vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGMA 500GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 November 2008 (17 years ago)1 September 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44480
Core clock speed200 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data394.8
Floating-point processing powerno data12.63 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data280
Tensor Coresno data280
L1 Cacheno data13.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1458 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.49 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2008 1 September 2021
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm

CMP 170HX 8 GB has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 and CMP 170HX 8 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 is a notebook graphics card while CMP 170HX 8 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 8 GB
CMP 170HX 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 26 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 108 votes

Rate CMP 170HX 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 or CMP 170HX 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.