ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition AGP vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGMA 500RV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2008 (16 years ago)29 April 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4no data
Core clock speed200 MHz324 MHz
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm130 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.296
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data196 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.272 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.19.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2008 29 April 2005

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 and All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 is a notebook graphics card while All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500
ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition AGP
All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 26 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 500 or All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.