Radeon RX 550X vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated648
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.69
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameMontevinaLexa
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)16 December 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10512
Core clock speed640 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1183 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data37.86
Floating-point processing powerno data1.211 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data96 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 16 December 2018
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm

RX 550X has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD and Radeon RX 550X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 550X is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
AMD Radeon RX 550X
Radeon RX 550X

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 132 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD or Radeon RX 550X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.