Radeon R5 A220 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameMontevinaCaicos
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10160
Core clock speed640 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistorsno data370 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.200
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1800 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm

R5 A220 has a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD and Radeon R5 A220. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R5 A220 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
AMD Radeon R5 A220
Radeon R5 A220

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 31 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD or Radeon R5 A220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.