Radeon Pro 5500M vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated365
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.59
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameMontevinaNavi 14
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)13 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores101536
Core clock speed640 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data85 Watt
Texture fill rateno data139.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.454 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data96
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 13 November 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm

Pro 5500M has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD and Radeon Pro 5500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5500M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 310 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD or Radeon Pro 5500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.