HD Graphics P3000 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1239
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameMontevinaSandy Bridge GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)1 February 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1096
Core clock speed640 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data995 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm32 nm
Texture fill rateno data16.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2592 TFLOPS
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm

HD Graphics P3000 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 103% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD and HD Graphics P3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics P3000 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 59 votes

Rate HD Graphics P3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD or HD Graphics P3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.