GMA X3100 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameMontevinaBroadwater
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (15 years ago)9 May 2007 (16 years ago)
Current priceno data$132

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10no data
Core clock speed640 MHz500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.000

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD and GMA X3100 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX109.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkanno dataN/A

Pros & Cons Summary


Recency 1 October 2008 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD and GMA X3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD is a notebook card while GMA X3100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD
Intel GMA X3100
GMA X3100

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4700MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 41 vote

Rate GMA X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.