Tesla PG503-216 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMontevinaGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)26 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores104608
Core clock speed533 MHz1312 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1530 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data440.6
Floating-point processing powerno data14.1 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data288
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data10 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1106 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.13 TB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 26 November 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm

Tesla PG503-216 has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and Tesla PG503-216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD is a notebook graphics card while Tesla PG503-216 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
NVIDIA Tesla PG503-216
Tesla PG503-216

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 254 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate Tesla PG503-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or Tesla PG503-216, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.