Riva TNT2 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1592
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameMontevinaNV5
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)12 October 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10no data
Core clock speed533 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistorsno data15 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm250 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.25
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSDR
Maximum RAM amountno data16 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data150 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX106.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 12 October 1999
Chip lithography 65 nm 250 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 284.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and Riva TNT2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD is a notebook graphics card while Riva TNT2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 255 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 33 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or Riva TNT2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.