ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameMontevinaRV670
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10320
Core clock speed533 MHz669 MHz
Number of transistorsno data666 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data145 Watt
Texture fill rateno data10.70
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data292 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1700 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data54.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DVI

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm

ATI HD 3850 X3 has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD and Radeon HD 3850 X3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 3850 X3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD
ATI Radeon HD 3850 X3
Radeon HD 3850 X3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 242 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 3850 X3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500MHD or Radeon HD 3850 X3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.