ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1228
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.36
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGL40R600
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)6 November 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10240
Core clock speed400 MHz601 MHz
Number of transistorsno data720 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data7.212
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2885 TFLOPS
ROPsno data12
TMUsno data12
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data51.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 6 November 2007
Chip lithography 65 nm 80 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 23.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M and Radeon HD 2900 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2900 GT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
Radeon HD 2900 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 196 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M or Radeon HD 2900 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.