Quadro Plex 2200 D2 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGL40GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10240 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data640 Watt
Texture fill rateno data51.84 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×2
ROPsno data32 ×2
TMUsno data80 ×2
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthno data512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 25 July 2008
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M has an age advantage of 2 months.

Plex 2200 D2, on the other hand, has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M and Quadro Plex 2200 D2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro Plex 2200 D2 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 D2
Quadro Plex 2200 D2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 196 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 D2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M or Quadro Plex 2200 D2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.