NVS 5100M vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.04
ArchitectureGen. 4.5 (2008)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGL40GT216
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1048
Core clock speed400 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data486 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data8.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1162 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 7 January 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm

NVS 5100M has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M and NVS 5100M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M is a notebook graphics card while NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
NVIDIA NVS 5100M
NVS 5100M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 182 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 36 votes

Rate NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M or NVS 5100M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.