Radeon RX 6900 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated35
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.25
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCedar TrailNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2011 (14 years ago)28 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores44608
Boost clock speed640 MHz2105 MHz
Number of transistorsno data23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data255 Watt
Texture fill rateno data606.2
Floating-point processing powerno data19.4 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 28 October 2020
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm

RX 6900 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 and Radeon RX 6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 30 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 90 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 or Radeon RX 6900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.