CMP 100HX-210 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameCedar TrailGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 November 2011 (14 years ago)2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores45120
Core clock speedno data555 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz1147 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data367.0
Floating-point processing powerno data11.75 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data7.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data810 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data829.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm

CMP 100HX-210 has a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 and CMP 100HX-210. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 is a notebook graphics card while CMP 100HX-210 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
NVIDIA CMP 100HX-210
CMP 100HX-210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 30 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 9 votes

Rate CMP 100HX-210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 or CMP 100HX-210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.