UHD Graphics P750 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated654
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.86
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameCedar TrailRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4256
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology32 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data83.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics P750 has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and UHD Graphics P750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 is a notebook card while UHD Graphics P750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
Intel UHD Graphics P750
UHD Graphics P750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 138 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 64 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.