Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated47
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)RDNA 4 (2025)
GPU code nameCedar Trailno data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2011 (14 years ago)2 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores42048
Boost clock speed400 MHz2530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology32 nm4 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 1
RX 9060 XT 16GB 125707
+12570600%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 2 January 2025
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm

RX 9060 XT 16GB has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 166 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 437 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.