ATI Radeon 7500 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1589
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.03
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameCedar TrailRV200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2011 (14 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4no data
Core clock speedno data290 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data60 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.740
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data230 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.36 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data7.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 14 August 2001
Chip lithography 32 nm 150 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 368.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 and Radeon 7500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7500 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600
ATI Radeon 7500
Radeon 7500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 164 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 48 votes

Rate Radeon 7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 or Radeon 7500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.