Radeon RX Vega 7 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	501
Place by popularity	not in top-100	10
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	10.99
Architecture	Gen. 4 (2007−2010)	Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code name	Pineview	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	10 January 2010 (14 years ago)	7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	no data	$387

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2	448
Boost clock speed	200 MHz	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	123 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	45 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	15 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

+

+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

no data

12_1

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	10 January 2010	7 January 2020
Chip lithography	45 nm	7 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---