ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1240
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.02
Power efficiencyno data1.15
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code namePineviewRV630
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2010 (16 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2120
Core clock speedno data800 MHz
Boost clock speed200 MHzno data
Number of transistors123 Million390 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.400
Floating-point processing powerno data0.192 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data700 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data10.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 44% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 and Radeon HD 2600 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2600 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 354 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 101 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 or Radeon HD 2600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.