A100 SXM4 80 GB vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 4 (2007−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code namePineviewGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 January 2010 (15 years ago)16 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores26912
Core clock speedno data1095 MHz
Boost clock speed200 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors123 Million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data400 Watt
Texture fill rateno data609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPsno data160
TMUsno data432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data40 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data80 GB
Memory bus widthno data5120 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1593 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2,039 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno dataN/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLno dataN/A
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2010 16 November 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm

A100 SXM4 80 GB has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 and A100 SXM4 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 is a notebook graphics card while A100 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 353 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 82 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3150 or A100 SXM4 80 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.