Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking523not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023−2025)RDNA 3+
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64128
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1950 MHz2200 MHz
L1 Cache768 KBno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12_2

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000). We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 22 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) or Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9000), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.