ATI Radeon 9250 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4881609
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023−2025)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameno dataRV280
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2025 (1 year ago)1 March 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed300 MHz240 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data36 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data150 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.96
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data8.1
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 20−22 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 48 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 24 no data
Fortnite 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 95−100 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 22 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 22 no data
Fortnite 60−65 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16 no data
Metro Exodus 20−22 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31 no data
Valorant 95−100 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 21 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2025 1 March 2004

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) has an age advantage of 20 years.

We couldn't decide between Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) and Radeon 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9250 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) or Radeon 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.