Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 495 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG (2023) | PowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011) |
| GPU code name | Meteor Lake iGPU | Cedar Trail |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 December 2023 (2 years ago) | 1 November 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4 | 4 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1950 MHz | 640 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 32 nm |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Shared memory | + | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 December 2023 | 1 November 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 32 nm |
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
