GMA 3150 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5021598
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023−2025)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUPineview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (2 years ago)9 May 2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores416
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1950 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data123 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.8
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data2
L1 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCI

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data9.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Far Cry 5 24 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Far Cry 5 22 no data
Fortnite 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 15 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22 no data
Far Cry 5 21 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 10−12 no data
Valorant 100−110 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 20−22 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 5−6 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 9−10 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2023 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 5 nm 45 nm

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 181 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.