GeForce 8200M G mGPU vs GeForce4 Ti 4800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1575not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNV28 A1C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 2003 (23 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors36 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt
Texture fill rate2.4003.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0256 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length216 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed325 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.33.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 March 2003 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm

8200M G mGPU has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 Ti 4800 and GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 Ti 4800 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 28 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 Ti 4800 or GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.