UHD Graphics 610 vs GeForce4 Ti 4200-8X

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated910
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.63
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV28 A1Coffee Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (22 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed250 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors36 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.00010.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xRing Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 610 has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 Ti 4200-8X and UHD Graphics 610. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 Ti 4200-8X is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 610 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200-8X
GeForce4 Ti 4200-8X
Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 17 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4200-8X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 642 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.