Radeon Instinct MI200 vs GeForce4 MX + nForce2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameCrush17Aldebaran
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2002 (23 years ago)December 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6656
Core clock speed200 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors29 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8707.2
Floating-point processing powerno data22.63 TFLOPS
ROPs2no data
TMUs4416
L1 Cacheno data1.6 MB
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared64 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,638 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.3N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 150 nm 6 nm

Instinct MI200 has a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX + nForce2 and Radeon Instinct MI200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX + nForce2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Instinct MI200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 MX nForce2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 12 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX + nForce2 or Radeon Instinct MI200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.