Radeon Pro 575 vs GeForce4 MX 420 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Polaris 20
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 February 2002 (23 years ago)5 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed250 MHz1096 MHz
Number of transistors29 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data120 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000140.3
Floating-point processing powerno data4.489 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs4128
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s217.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

Pro 575 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 420 PCI and Radeon Pro 575. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 420 PCI is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 575 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420 PCI
GeForce4 MX 420 PCI
AMD Radeon Pro 575
Radeon Pro 575

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 420 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX 420 PCI or Radeon Pro 575, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.