GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh vs GeForce4 MX 4000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1510not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV18 A4GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date14 December 2003 (20 years ago)6 July 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed250 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1492 MHz
Number of transistors29 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00095.49
Floating-point processing powerno data6.111 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s144.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2003 6 July 2022
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 18 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 4000 and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 4000 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
GeForce4 MX 4000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 939 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 55 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.