Quadro RTX 8200 vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV18 C1GA102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 December 2003 (21 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7552
Core clock speed250 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors29 million40,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data260 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000708.0
Floating-point processing powerno data22.66 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs4472

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm

RTX 8200 has a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 and Quadro RTX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 8200 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2
GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8200
Quadro RTX 8200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 15 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 or Quadro RTX 8200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.