GRID M60-8Q vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.16
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNV18 C1GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 December 2003 (21 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed250 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistors29 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000150.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4128
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2003 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

GRID M60-8Q has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 and GRID M60-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while GRID M60-8Q is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2
GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GRID M60-8Q
GRID M60-8Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M60-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX 4000 Rev. 2 or GRID M60-8Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.