GeForce FX 5600 XT vs GeForce4 MX 4000 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameNV18 C1NV31
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 December 2003 (21 years ago)17 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed250 MHz235 MHz
Number of transistors29 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate1.0000.94
ROPs24
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.09.0a
OpenGL1.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 December 2003 17 March 2003
Chip lithography 150 nm 130 nm

GeForce4 MX 4000 PCI has an age advantage of 8 months.

FX 5600 XT, on the other hand, has a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 MX 4000 PCI and GeForce FX 5600 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000 PCI
GeForce4 MX 4000 PCI
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600 XT
GeForce FX 5600 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 4000 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 36 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX 4000 PCI or GeForce FX 5600 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.