Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs GeForce4 Go 4200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated9
Place by popularitynot in top-10053
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.82
Power efficiencyno data15.67
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameNV28 A1Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 November 2002 (22 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed200 MHz1929 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2498 MHz
Number of transistors36 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data355 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600959.2
Floating-point processing powerno data61.39 TFLOPS
ROPs4192
TMUs8384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data287 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2002 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

RX 7900 XTX has an age advantage of 19 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 Go 4200 and Radeon RX 7900 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 Go 4200 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XTX is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 Go 4200
GeForce4 Go 4200
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 Go 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4062 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 Go 4200 or Radeon RX 7900 XTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.