GMA vs GeForce4 Go 4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1595
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)PowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameNV28 A1Cloverview
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 November 2002 (23 years ago)4 May 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed200 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors36 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm32 nm
Texture fill rate1.6001.066
ROPs41
TMUs82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.19.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.3ES 2.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 November 2002 4 May 2010
Chip lithography 150 nm 32 nm

GMA has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 368.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 Go 4200 and GMA. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 Go 4200
GeForce4 Go 4200
Intel GMA
GMA

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 Go 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 12 votes

Rate GMA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 Go 4200 or GMA, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.