GeForce RTX 3080 vs GeForce4 488 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated42
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data38.89
Power efficiencyno data14.38
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV18 A4GA102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2002 (23 years ago)1 September 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28704
Core clock speed300 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed275 MHz1710 MHz
Number of transistors29 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data320 Watt
Texture fill rate1.200465.1
Floating-point processing powerno data29.77 TFLOPS
ROPs296
TMUs4272
Tensor Coresno data272
Ray Tracing Coresno data68
L1 Cacheno data8.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount64 MB10 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/s760.3 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2002 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm

RTX 3080 has an age advantage of 18 years, a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 488 Go and GeForce RTX 3080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 488 Go is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 488 Go
GeForce4 488 Go
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 488 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 8062 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 488 Go or GeForce RTX 3080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.