FirePro A300 vs GeForce4 488 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameNV18 A4Trinity GL
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2002 (24 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2384
Core clock speed300 MHz760 MHz
Boost clock speed275 MHz905 MHz
Number of transistors29 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate1.20021.72
Floating-point processing powerno data0.695 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed275 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.34.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2002 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 150 nm 32 nm

FirePro A300 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 369% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 488 Go and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 488 Go is a notebook graphics card while FirePro A300 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 488 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 488 Go or FirePro A300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.