FirePro A320 vs GeForce4 448 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1572not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameNV18 A4Trinity GL
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2002 (23 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed200 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data955 MHz
Number of transistors29 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate0.822.92
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7334 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.34.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2002 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 150 nm 32 nm

FirePro A320 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 368.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 448 Go and FirePro A320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 448 Go is a notebook graphics card while FirePro A320 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 448 Go
GeForce4 448 Go
AMD FirePro A320
FirePro A320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 448 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate FirePro A320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 448 Go or FirePro A320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.