Radeon R7 240 OEM vs GeForce4 420 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1595not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV17 A5Oland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 February 2002 (24 years ago)1 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2320
Core clock speed200 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed190 MHz780 MHz
Number of transistors29 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.815.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4992 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs420
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 1 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R7 240 OEM has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 420 Go and Radeon R7 240 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 420 Go is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 240 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce4 420 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate Radeon R7 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 420 Go or Radeon R7 240 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.