Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP vs GeForce4 420 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1590not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV17 A5Kalindi
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (23 years ago)1 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2128
Core clock speed200 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed190 MHzno data
Number of transistors29 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.83.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1024 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed200 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 1 November 2013
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

HD 8240 Mobile IGP has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 420 Go and Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 420 Go
GeForce4 420 Go
AMD Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce4 420 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 420 Go or Radeon HD 8240 Mobile IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.