ATI Radeon VE AGP vs GeForce4 410 Go

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Rage 6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 February 2002 (24 years ago)19 February 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed200 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors29 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rate0.80.55
ROPs21
TMUs43

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount16 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s2.928 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.07.0
OpenGL1.31.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 180 nm

GeForce4 410 Go has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

ATI VE AGP, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 410 Go and Radeon VE AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce4 410 Go is a notebook graphics card while Radeon VE AGP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 410 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon VE AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 410 Go or Radeon VE AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.