Radeon 625 vs GeForce4 410 Go

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated794
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.90
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (22 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed200 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistors29 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.824.58
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed200 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2002 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

Radeon 625 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce4 410 Go and Radeon 625. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 410 Go
GeForce4 410 Go
AMD Radeon 625
Radeon 625

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce4 410 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 145 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.