Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 vs GeForce3

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1508not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNV20 A5Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 February 2001 (23 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speed200 MHzno data
Number of transistors57 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm10 nm
Texture fill rate1.600no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xno data
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR4
Maximum RAM amount64 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed230 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth3.68 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.0DirectX 12_1
OpenGL1.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 February 2001 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 150 nm 10 nm

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce3 and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce3 is a desktop card while Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce3
GeForce3
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 52 votes

Rate GeForce3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.