GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 vs GeForce3

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1584not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNV20 A5Crush11
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 February 2001 (25 years ago)4 June 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed200 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors57 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate1.6000.7
ROPs42
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 4x
Length165 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed230 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth3.68 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.07.0
OpenGL1.31.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 February 2001 4 June 2001
Chip lithography 150 nm 180 nm

GeForce3 has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce2 MX + nForce 220, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

We couldn't decide between GeForce3 and GeForce2 MX + nForce 220. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 57 votes

Rate GeForce3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce3 or GeForce2 MX + nForce 220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.