Radeon RX 640 vs GeForce3 Ti500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data7.88
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV20 A5Polaris 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2001 (23 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data640
Core clock speed240 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1218 MHz
Number of transistors57 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.92048.72
Floating-point processing powerno data1.559 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8
Length183 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2001 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

RX 640 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce3 Ti500 and Radeon RX 640. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce3 Ti500 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 640 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce3 Ti500
GeForce3 Ti500
AMD Radeon RX 640
Radeon RX 640

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 29 votes

Rate GeForce3 Ti500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 269 votes

Rate Radeon RX 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce3 Ti500 or Radeon RX 640, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.