GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs GeForce2 Ultra

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1568not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV15 A4GT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 August 2000 (25 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed250 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors25 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data31 Watt
Texture fill rate2.0004.160
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length183 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed230 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.36 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.23.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2000 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 40 nm

210 Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Ultra and GeForce 210 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra
GeForce2 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2
GeForce 210 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 52 votes

Rate GeForce2 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 81 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 Ultra or GeForce 210 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.